Alternative to Giving Up Car Keys

An Alternative to Giving Up the Car Keys

John Gress for The New York Times

Anne Hegberg, left, an occupational therapist who specializes in helping drivers compensate for any lost skills, with a client, JoAnn Mantzke, 80.

Robert Cullon, 80, has a neurological condition that makes his feet numb and forces him to rely on a walker. He thought he was driving just fine, but his six children were worried.

 

“They kept saying, ‘Are you sure you’re doing all right?’ ” he said. “They broke me down.”

Instead of handing over his keys, though, Mr. Cullon, who lives in Albany, decided to consult a driving rehabilitation specialist. She rode with him, observing how well he used his feet, how good his reflexes were and how good his range of motion was in his shoulders and neck. Then she pronounced him fit to take the wheel.

His children backed off — and he felt reassured. As the baby boomer generation ages, more older drivers like Mr. Cullon are going to be on the road. In the United States, about 35 million licensed drivers are over 65, an increase of 20 percent since 2003, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

While that is a scary thought for some people, the common perception, that the only real choice is between ignoring the difficulties faced by elderly drivers and taking away the car keys, is wrong. “We’re evolving in our thinking,” said Jodi Olshevski, a gerontologist and executive director of the Hartford insurance company’s Center for Mature Market Excellence. “We’re not just looking at the transition from driver to passenger, but how we can empower drivers to extend their driving as long as possible.”

As the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in its five-year safety plan for older drivers released this month, the effort involves both behavioral and technological changes. But first, here’s what the statistics show: Most people assume that accident rates increase as drivers age, but the groups that have the highest fatal crash rates are teenagers and those 75 years and older, said Sharon Gilmartin, a spokeswoman for AAA.

“From 65 to 70 years old, you’re looking at rates similar to middle-aged drivers,” she said. In fact, older drivers are often safer, because they are less likely to speed, drive drunk or text while driving.

But per mile traveled, fatal crash rates increase beginning at age 75 and rise sharply after age 80. That’s not necessarily because older people have more accidents but because they are more fragile and less likely to recover from serious injuries, Ms. Gilmartin said.

Teenagers are much more likely to kill someone else in a crash; older adults are far more likely to kill themselves.

“A 50-year-old driver may not be safe, and a 95-year-old driver may function perfectly,” she said. “Driving is a function of ability, not age.”

Only one state, Illinois, requires a road test for elderly drivers, while many require people 70 and older to renew driver’s licenses in person, rather than by mail or online. Some require more frequent renewals or written or vision tests as drivers get older.

Ms. Gilmartin does not advocate road tests for older people. These tests have shown no safety benefit, she said, and can create such anxiety that some people just quit driving to avoid the test, leading to “a loss of independence that can be devastating.”

To help older people drive longer and more safely, Ms. Olshevski said, “we’re connecting the dots between what we know about healthy aging and driving.”

Take turning your head when making a lane change. As flexibility and range of motion decrease with age, that simple motion can become difficult. And that difficulty can cause accidents. But certain exercises can help. The Hartford and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology AgeLab, which is part of the university’s School of Engineering, have aseries of online videos demonstrating the exercises.

Technology can also help. Some cars are now equipped with blind spot warning systems — cameras that detect an un

seen car and trigger a light on the dashboard.

The most helpful technology for older drivers, according to experts assembled by the Hartford and the M.I.T. AgeLab, include “smart” headlights that adjust the range and intensity of light to improve night vision and systems that warn the driver if the vehicle is straying from its lane.

In its report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration emphasized advances in collision avoidance. Technology that is already available in some cars alerts the driver with a beep or light to obstacles crossing behind or stopped in front of the car. In some models, the car will slow if it appears that the driver isn’t braking.

A lane departure warning, which notifies the driver if the car is drifting into another lane without a turn signal on, is another option.

The safety administration is also contemplating a “silver” car rating system to help identify cars that better protect older drivers and passengers

For the future, the Department of Transportation is collaborating with automobile manufacturers on vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication.

<nyt_text>

That would allow cars to “talk” to each other and to traffic signals, tollbooths and work zones, for example, to warn of dangerous roadway conditions, accidents and other potential problems.

While all this technology is a plus for older drivers — and all drivers — it would be dangerous to rely on it too much, said Scott Oldham, editor in chief of the car site Edmunds.com.

“They’re meant to be aids, not replace the driver,” he said. “There is no substitute for an attentive driver.”

With the best car in the world, drivers need to be confident that their knowledge, skills and reflexes are up to par. The easiest way to conduct an initial check is to take an online screening assessment. AAA and AARP, to name just two, provide such questionnaires. AAA offers both a self-rating form and a series of computer-based exercisesthat can help you test your physical flexibility and memory.

If the assessments raise a red flag, the next step might be to get an on-the-road driving assessment; rehabilitation centers often offer them.

If a problem is identified, it might be fixable, and a driving rehabilitation specialist can help with that.

Donna Stressel, a driving specialist in Schenectady, N.Y, who helped Mr. Cullon, said her company charged $420 for an initial two-hour evaluation and $125 for each additional hour needed. In some cases, medical insurance or Medicare will cover this as part of occupational therapy.

But, she said, costs vary depending on the part of the country, ranging from $200 to $1,000 for an evaluation.

She said that in the 25 years she had been a driving specialist, she had seen a large increase in the number of older drivers coming in for assessment and training.

“The demand is greater than the resources,” she said.

Too many older people fear that if they admit to any driving concerns, they will have to stop, said Elin Schold Davis, coordinator of the older driver initiative for the American Occupational Therapy Association. That kind of thinking leads to people driving with physical or cognitive problems that they aren’t acknowledging — or to stopping driving before they have to.

Anne Hegberg, a driver rehabilitation specialist at Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital in Wheaton, Ill., said many older drivers didn’t even realize they were doing things that could be a danger to themselves or other drivers.

“They’ll tell us they’re not resting their foot on the brake, but we have a brake light visible in the front seat, so we can see that they are,” she said.

Her job is to determine whether someone can undo bad habits with some lessons or needs to retire from driving.

There are many options to explore; one relatively easy possibility is to drive only during the day or on local roads.

Or the solution may be more complicated; for example, if an older driver is groggy or having a lot of near misses, “maybe the doctor needs to look at the combination of medication,” Ms. Schold Davis said

Her organization’s website offers a list, searchable by ZIP code, of occupational therapists who specialize in driving rehabilitation.

And who knows? In the near future, such quandaries might be a thing of the past. Older people might be giving up the car keys not to sit at home, but to hop into a self-driving car.

Source: The NY Times

75 Is The New Old

75 Is The New Old: VA DMV Study Recommends Fitness Tests For Aging Drivers

By David Sherfinski – The Washington Times – Sunday, December 15, 2013

A yearlong study by the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles is recommending a closer examination of the fitness of elderly motorists and the granting of legal immunity to people who provide information to the state about those who might not be fit to drive.

 

The study tackles head-on a sensitive issue for many families: how to decide whether a loved one is able to drive a car safely.

 

The debate also involves the balance between individual liberty and public safety.

 

The chairmen of the Virginia House and Senate transportation committees called on the DMV in January to establish a stakeholders group to study “whether the Commonwealth should adopt additional objective criteria in current license renewal requirements as a means of assessing mature drivers’ continued capability to remain active, safe, independent, and mobile on the road as they age.”

 

In response, the “licensing committee” of the group is recommending that Virginia lower the age for mandatory in-person license renewal from 80 to 75 and shorten the license renewal period from eight years to five years for drivers 75 and older.

 

According to the Virginia Department of Taxation, the DMV would lose $818,285 in annual revenue from fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2021 as a result of reduced fees for five-year licenses ($20) compared with eight-year licenses ($32). Increased costs to serve additional customer visits are estimated to be $203,866 annually.

 

Some applauded the study’s findings. David Morrell and Bryan Morrell became involved in the issue after their relative, Darren Morrell, was killed Nov, 8, 2011, when an older driver pulled out of a small commercial area and made a left turn without yielding.

 

“This is certainly a national phenomenon, not just a local issue, and additional effort needs to be made to understand the effects of the aging process on the ability to drive safely and how the aging process is different for each individual,” the Morrells wrote to DMV Commissioner Richard D. Holcomb.

 

David M. DeBiasi with AARP Virginia said that the group appreciates the DMV’s work but believes the recommendations should not be based on age.

 

He wrote to Mr. Holcomb saying issues like testing functional impairment and granting licenses tailored to specific individuals based on test results are not specific to age.

 

“We are not in favor of the age-based model since the real issue is health, not age,” he wrote.

 

Mr. DeBiasi said the AARP supports in-person renewal of licenses at regular intervals for all drivers. “Rather than making an ‘age’ the trigger for infrequent renewals, one approach might be to have an individual’s driving record and medical situation be the trigger,” he said.

 

In addition to the recommendations for older drivers, the study proposes changes to Virginia code that would give greater protections to members of the public who provide information about drivers that could lead to the suspension or revocation of their licenses.

 

Right now, drivers can request information about who supplies information to the DMV about their fitness to operate a vehicle, unless it’s a relative or medical professional involved in the driver’s treatment.

 

However, draft legislation accompanying the report would protect the source of information supplied to the department, no matter who it comes from, as long as the information is provided “in good faith.”

 

“Persons who have supplied information to the Department in good faith regarding a driver’s fitness to drive shall be immune from any civil or criminal liability in connection with providing such information, unless it is proven that such person acted in bad faith or with malicious intent,” the draft legislation says.

 

The group also recommends “continuing to monitor and collect data on drivers age 85 and older and their incidents of crashes, improper actions and convictions to determine whether the license renewal period should be further shortened.”

 

The study shows fewer crashes per licensed older driver but an increasing rate of older drivers being at fault when crashes do occur. Figures also indicate that when older drivers are involved in crashes, they are more likely to suffer injuries or fatalities compared with drivers in other age ranges.

 

The driver licensing committee also recommends amending state code to give judges the option of requiring drivers to attend “mature driver motor vehicle crash prevention courses where applicable based on the offenses committed.”

 

Source: The Washington Times

Older drivers Would Have to Renew Licenses Every 4-Years

Older Drivers Would Have To Renew Licenses Every 4-Years

Tuesday, December 10, 2013 12:36 a.m. CST
Women walk past Fiat cars under covers at a dealership in Rome October 30, 2012. REUTERS/Alessandro Bianchi

MADISON (WRN)  Legislation would have older drivers renew their driver’s licenses twice as often.

State Senator Fred Risser (D-Madison) is proposing legislation that would require drivers 75 years of age and older to renew their driver’s license every four years, rather than every eight years, which is current law. And, at each renewal, these drivers would have to pass an eyesight exam.

“Seems to me that when a person is up at that age an eight-year license renewal is unrealistic. One’s health changes; one’s eyes change.” Risser says there’s evidence proving his point. “Insurance statistics show that the worse drivers are the real young and the real old.”

Risser says this would be one way to help make the roads a little safer for everyone. He says if older folks are forced to renew their license more often, they might think twice about whether they really ought to be driving.

Critics say this plan is discriminatory to target drivers based on age. Risser disagrees, saying there are already laws requiring changes based on age. “We have people retire at certain ages if they’re in certain classifications of activities. Firemen and policemen have to be in good health and we don’t want them on at 80 years of age.”

At 86, Risser would have to abide by the more frequent renewals, and he’s OK with that.

Risser and John Lehman (D-Racine) are circulating the bill for co-sponsorship.

 

Source: WSAU 

Proposal: Test Older Drivers Wisconsin Legislation to Require More Vision Exams

Proposal: Test Older Drivers

BILL FROM SEN. LEHMAN WOULD REQUIRE MORE VISION EXAMS

January 2, 2014 6:43 am

A proposal from state Sen. John Lehman would make elderly drivers pass vision exams every four years instead of every eight.

In Wisconsin, drivers who have advanced beyond a probationary license must take a vision test every eight years to renew their driver’s licenses. Lehman’s proposal would change that to every four years for those 75 and older; they would have to pass a vision exam but would not have to retake a driving test, the Racine Democrat said.

Individuals would be able to take the vision exam at their regular eye doctor and would not necessarily need to visit a state Division of Motor Vehicles location, Lehman added.

“We decided on the (proposal) the way it is because its price tag is not as high as making sure that everybody goes into the driver’s testing station and has another road test,” Lehman said, explaining the change as proposed would have a very minimal annual cost.

Lehman said his proposal comes from two concerns: elderly drivers being the second-most dangerous group on the roadways, after young, inexperienced drivers; and how difficult it can be to take a driver’s license away from an elderly parent or grandparent.

“What children of older parents run into is trying to make sure there’s a good decision about whether or not mom or dad should be driving and we think that this will help the discussions by making sure that there is a shorter period of time between when that license has to be renewed,” he said.

AARP-Wisconsin spokesman Jim Flaherty acknowledged those family discussions can indeed be difficult but said that doesn’t mean laws should change.

While AARP-Wisconsin will not take a position on the proposal, Flaherty said the organization in general “does not favor legislation that looks at drivers based solely on their age. Diminished capacity of driving is not necessarily linked to age.

“It’s up to our state and our department of motor vehicle regulators to be monitoring people (based) more on medical capacity than (on) age,” he continued.

Flaherty said that’s especially important when dealing with older drivers, whose independence often hinges on being able to drive themselves around town.

Numerous other states already have more frequent examination periods for older drivers, though, Lehman said.

There is no specific timeline for when his proposal might be taken up by the state Senate. The proposal also comes from 86-year-old state Sen. Fred Risser, a Madison Democrat who Lehman said is the Senate’s oldest member.

 

Source: The Journal Times